How Congress Can Reduce the Regulatory Burden on Small Business
In a Washington Times op-ed, NFIB’s Manager of Federal Government Relations Josh McLeod explained the purpose of the RFA is to protect small businesses.
Minnesota Democrats Approve Paid Family and Medical Leave Mandate
With less than a week left to go in the 2023 legislative session, Minnesota Democrats signed off on the largest and most expensive employment mandate in state history.
Supreme Court Ruling in National Pork Producers Council v. Ross Places Further Burdens on Small Businesses Nationwide
Update: Movement in U.S. Supreme Court Cases Significant for Small Businesses
In March and April, there was significant action in three U.S. Supreme Court cases where NFIB filed?amicus briefs.
The Danger of One-Size-Fits-All Regulations for Small Business
The Regulatory Flexibility Act was meant to protect small businesses from one-size-fits-allrulemaking, yet administrative agencies often fail to comply.
New NFIB Small Business Legal Center White Paper: Strengthening the Regulatory Flexibility Act to Protect Small Business
WASHINGTON, D.C. (May 2, 2023) – The NFIB Small Business Legal Center released a new White Paper titled, “The Regulatory Flexibility Act: Turning a Paper Tiger into a Legitimate Constraint on One-Size-Fits-All Agency Rulemaking.” The paper explores the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), its purpose t
Small Businesses Continue Fight Against Final WOTUS Rule in Latest Amicus Briefs
NFIB Urges Legislative Action Following New Report on Cost of Lawsuit Abuse
House Should Cut the Lights on the POWR Act
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Tony Gagliardi, Colorado State Director, tony.gagliardi@nfib.org,
or Tony Malandra, Senior Media Manager, anthony.malandra@nfib.org
DENVER, April 26, 2023—One business association today separated itself from some of the sister associations it often partners with o
Sales Tax Case Imposes Significant Financial Burden on Small Businesses
WASHINGTON, D.C. (April 17, 2023) – NFIB filed an amicus brief in the case Quad Graphics, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Revenue at the U.S. Supreme Court. The case concerns whether the North Carolina Supreme Court wrongfully held that taxing authorities don’t have to follow the United States