Topics:
February 2, 2023
The cases involve the right to arbitrate and recover for property damages during unionized strikes
NFIB Advocates for Small Business Owners in Two Major Court Cases
Coinbase v Abraham Bielski
On Jan. 27, the Small Business Legal Center filed an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court, disagreeing with the decision made by the Ninth Circuit. The lower court’s decision held that if a trial court denies a motion to compel arbitration and the filing party appeals, the filing party must simultaneously litigate the case before the trial court and litigate the arbitration appeal before the Court of Appeals. In other words, the party that filed for arbitration would be forced to argue two cases at the same time in front of two different courts. “Small businesses benefit from arbitration as an alternative to litigation, as arbitration allows owners to resolve disputes promptly and efficiently,” said Small Business Legal Center Executive Director Beth Milito. “Arbitration is often used by small business owners because it is a more cost-effective option compared to costly litigation. We are hopeful that the Supreme Court will agree and reverse the lower court’s ruling.”Glacier Northwest, Inc. v International Brotherhood of Teamsters
On Jan. 10, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case where NFIB previously filed an amicus brief. This case originated when employees from a building company, Glacier Northwest, went on strike after negotiations over a new union contract hit a stalemate. Because of the strike, Glacier lost 16 loads of concrete that was already loaded into the trucks when the strike was called. Glacier sued The International Brotherhood of Teamsters over the wasted concrete, but the Washington Supreme Court concluded that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) preempts suits of this nature. Glacier has now asked the Supreme Court to reverse the Washington Supreme Court’s harmful decision. NFIB’s brief argues that the NLRA does not preempt suits similar to this one, and the Supreme Court’s precedent is clear that the NLRA does not immunize unions from the intentional destruction of an employer’s property. NFIB filed the brief with seven different trade associations. “This decision could create a significant imbalance of power between unions and employers and would leave small business owners with no course of action should their property be destroyed,” said Beth Milito. “NFIB urges the Supreme Court to adhere to its previous precedents and protect small businesses across the nation.”
Get to know NFIB
NFIB is a member-driven organization advocating on behalf of small and independent businesses nationwide.
Related Articles
April 16, 2026
NFIB President Brad Close in Washington Times: Small Business Deduction Is A Big Win For Main Street
WASHINGTON, D.C. (April 16, 2026) – In a new op-ed in The Washington Times, NFIB President Brad Close shares how Main Street is benefiting from the 20% Small B…
Read More
April 16, 2026
What They Are Saying: Virginia Small Business Owner Uses 20% Small Business Deduction for Employee Raises
VIDEO: NFIB member Tina Miller explains how the permanence of the 20% Small Business Deduction has helped her invest back into her business and community.
Read More
April 15, 2026
Small Business Optimism Index Falls Below Average
The March Small Business Economic Trends report sees a three-point decline in small business optimism. Following suit, the Employment Index also fell two point…
Read More
April 15, 2026
NFIB Praises Committee Passage of Legislation to Provide More Transparency
HB 5281 Requires Reporting of Third Party Litigation Funders.
Read More