STATE:

Why NFIB

Take Action

Get Support

Stay Informed

Podcast Podcast

Careers Careers

Join Now

Home / News / Press Release /

U.S. Supreme Court Fails to Strengthen Protection of Personal Property

May 9, 2024 Last Edit: December 4, 2024

U.S. Supreme Court Fails to Strengthen Protection of Personal Property

WASHINGTON, D.C. (May 9, 2024) – NFIB is disappointed in today’s decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Culley v. Steven Marshall, Attorney General of Alabama. Small businesses were hopeful that the Court would establish that innocent small business owners are entitled to a prompt post-deprivation hearing. Instead, many small businesses will be forced to go through a lengthy and costly forfeiture process. NFIB filed an amicus brief in the case urging the Supreme Court to reverse the Eleventh Circuit’s ruling. “When it comes to civil asset forfeiture, small business owners who rent, sell, or conduct cash transactions are particularly vulnerable to harm,” said Beth Milito, Executive Director of NFIB’s Small Business Legal Center. “Because of this decision, many small business property owners will continue to be targeted and injured by a civil asset forfeiture procedure that violates due process and punishes businesses for the actions of the public.” The case concerned the practice of law enforcement seizing personal property, known as civil asset forfeiture, and whether the Due Process Clause requires a post-seizure probable cause hearing. NFIB’s brief described how small businesses are targeted and injured in the absence of clear constitutional guardrails around civil asset forfeiture. While NFIB is disappointed that the Court did not strengthen the Due Process Clause’s protection of personal property by requiring a separate post-seizure hearing, we are hopeful that the Court’s stressing the importance of a timely forfeiture hearing will prevent drawn out property recovery proceedings. The NFIB Small Business Legal Center protects the rights of small business owners in the nation’s courts. NFIB is currently active in more than 40 cases in federal and state courts across the country and in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Topics:

Legal

U.S. Supreme Court

Get to know NFIB

NFIB is a member-driven organization advocating on behalf of small and independent businesses nationwide.

Learn More

May 28, 2026

Tax Alert – Taxpayers may be Eligible for Tax Refunds or Abatement Following a Recent Court Decision

A recent federal court decision could have major implications for taxpayers who were assessed IRS penalties and interest during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Kw…

May 28, 2026

Supreme Court Reduces Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements

Small businesses are disappointed in today’s decision at the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Flowers Foods, Inc., et al. v. Angelo Brock.

May 28, 2026

What’s Wrong With The Legislature Can Be Explained In These Two Bills

How can measures passing 78-0, 34-2 never get a hearing in the other chamber?

May 27, 2026

New NFIB Industry-Specific Survey Shows Shift in Small Business Optimism

WASHINGTON, D.C. (May 27, 2026) – The NFIB Research Center released an industry-specific quarterly Small Business Economic Trends survey highlighting the const…

U.S. Supreme Court Fails to Strengthen Protection of Personal Property

Related Articles