Release Date: 12/ 01/ 2005
CONTACT: Jim Brown, (615) 874-5288
Florida Entrepreneurs Pleased With Business Conditions, Less So With Business Environment
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- Florida's small-business owners said sales and profits were weaker this quarter, but they're still very positive about prospects over the next few months, according to the Florida Small-Business ConditionsSM. The report's data, which was released today by the National Federation of Independent Business/Florida, provides an overview of small-business conditions within Florida and compares them with neighboring states.
A net 44 percent (positive percent minus negative percent) of respondents said sales were "good" over the last quarter, down from a net 53 percent in September. A net 28 percent said profits were "good," below September's net 38 percent reading. Despite the slippage, a net 68 percent said prospects over the next few months look "good," which was the highest reading among six Southeast states and No. 2 among 26 states in the survey group.
A poorer business environment countered this optimism, with a net 25 percent saying the state's business environment – which includes government officials, bankers, media outlets and community organizations – is "supportive." That reading was last among the six Southeast states, but still a respectable No. 12 in the national survey group.
"Florida's small-business owners seem ready to uncork the champagne bottle this holiday season, but they've decided to wait another year until they see greater commitment to real reforms from our state leaders," NFIB/Florida Assistant State Director Patrick Arrington said. "Florida entrepreneurs recognize business conditions are good, but they also know more action and less token rhetoric from our leaders would go a long way in improving their situation and enhancing job creation."
Arrington pointed to the business environments in Georgia and South Carolina, which ranked No. 2 and No. 4, respectively, among the survey group, and noted that those states recently passed meaningful legal reform and economic packages for small business. Boding well for Florida, Arrington said, is that a net 50 percent of respondents said business conditions in their market area are "good," which was the No. 4 reading among 26 states, trailing only Virginia (net 53 percent) in the Southeast.
By region, business conditions were best in North Florida (net 63 percent said "good"), followed by Central Florida (net 57 percent), Tampa/West Coast (net 53 percent) and the Gold Coast (net 39 percent). The business environment was best in North Florida (net 35 percent said "supportive"), followed by Central Florida (net 29 percent), Tampa/West Coast (net 28 percent) and the Gold Coast (net 18 percent).
The Small-Business ConditionsSM reports are developed from surveys of small-business owners in selected states. The surveys are designed to determine the condition of the small-business economy in each particular state. The surveys are conducted every three months and results are released on the first day of the month following completion. The text of the questions and the complete response set to the survey can be found at www.NFIB.com/research.
| Florida Small-Business ConditionsSM | ||||||
| This chart shows the results within Florida and its principal regions. | ||||||
| Fla. | North | Central | Gold Coast |
Tampa/ W. Coast | ||
| Business Climate | Survey Date | |||||
| Overall state business environment | ||||||
| Net % supportive of small business | 11/2005 | 25 | 35 | 29 | 18 | 28 |
| Prior qtr. | 29 | 34 | 31 | 29 | 26 | |
| Business conditions in market area | ||||||
| Net % "good" | 11/2005 | 50 | 63 | 57 | 39 | 53 |
| Prior qtr. | 55 | 55 | 57 | 49 | 63 | |
| Net % "improving" | 11/2005 | 18 | 24 | 22 | 11 | 23 |
| Prior qtr. | 25 | 28 | 30 | 20 | 27 | |
| Outlook for business | ||||||
| Net % "good" in next three months | 11/2005 | 68 | 73 | 68 | 63 | 71 |
| Prior qtr. | 69 | 70 | 69 | 70 | 69 | |
| Reason for optimism | ||||||
| % Sales prospects | 11/2005 | 38 | 46 | 38 | 31 | 43 |
| Prior qtr. | 42 | 39 | 43 | 44 | 40 | |
| % Lower costs | 11/2005 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Prior qtr. | 4 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 3 | |
| % Price increases | 11/2005 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Prior qtr. | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| % Greater productivity | 11/2005 | 16 | 12 | 19 | 18 | 13 |
| Prior qtr. | 13 | 16 | 12 | 12 | 14 | |
| % Government policy | 11/2005 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Prior qtr. | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| % Seasonal/Weather | 11/2005 | 12 | 9 | 9 | 11 | 16 |
| Prior qtr. | 12 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 13 | |
| Reason for pessimism | ||||||
| % Sales prospects | 11/2005 | IC* | IC | IC | IC | IC |
| Prior qtr. | IC | IC | IC | IC | IC | |
| % Cost increases | 11/2005 | IC | IC | IC | IC | IC |
| Prior qtr. | IC | IC | IC | IC | IC | |
| % Pressure on selling prices | 11/2005 | IC | IC | IC | IC | IC |
| Prior qtr. | IC | IC | IC | IC | IC | |
| % Lower productivity | 11/2005 | IC | IC | IC | IC | IC |
| Prior qtr. | IC | IC | IC | IC | IC | |
| % Government policies | 11/2005 | IC | IC | IC | IC | IC |
| Prior qtr. | IC | IC | IC | IC | IC | |
| Fla. | North | Central | Gold Coast |
Tampa/ W. Coast | ||
| Sales and earnings (last quarter) | ||||||
| Sales | ||||||
| Net % sales "good" | 11/2005 | 44 | 59 | 47 | 34 | 49 |
| Prior qtr. | 53 | 55 | 55 | 50 | 54 | |
| Profits | ||||||
| Net % profits "good" | 11/2005 | 28 | 40 | 35 | 17 | 33 |
| Prior qtr. | 38 | 41 | 43 | 36 | 35 | |
| Employment | ||||||
| Current job openings (one or more) | ||||||
| % "Yes" | 11/2005 | 26 | 22 | 26 | 28 | 26 |
| Prior qtr. | 26 | 28 | 27 | 24 | 27 | |
| Per employee payroll cost | ||||||
| Net % "risen" | 11/2005 | 17 | 18 | 18 | 14 | 20 |
| Prior qtr. | 16 | 19 | 24 | 11 | 17 | |
| Employee cost pressures (greater) | ||||||
| % Wages | 11/2005 | 53 | 61 | 57 | 53 | 47 |
| Prior qtr. | 57 | 65 | 58 | 56 | 53 | |
| % Benefits | 11/2005 | 27 | 21 | 24 | 29 | 31 |
| Prior qtr. | 24 | 19 | 20 | 25 | 28 | |
| Fla. | North | Central | Gold Coast |
Tampa/ W. Coast | ||
| Productivity | ||||||
| Upgraded technology/processes (last three months) | ||||||
| % "Yes" | 11/2005 | 45 | 42 | 45 | 48 | 44 |
| Prior qtr. | 46 | 42 | 45 | 49 | 43 | |
| Made capital expenditure(s) (last three months) | ||||||
| % "Yes" | 11/2005 | 43 | 45 | 46 | 40 | 45 |
| Prior qtr. | 43 | 42 | 47 | 43 | 42 | |
| Made expenditure to train employee(s) (last three months) | ||||||
| % "Yes" | 11/2005 | 43 | 43 | 42 | 43 | 44 |
| Prior qtr. | 40 | 42 | 37 | 41 | 40 | |
| Capacity utilization - can increase sales 10% without new inputs | ||||||
| % "Yes" | 11/2005 | 55 | 59 | 55 | 52 | 56 |
| Prior qtr. | 55 | 56 | 58 | 54 | 54 | |
| Credit availability (last three months) | ||||||
| % All credit needs satisfied | 11/2005 | 42 | 36 | 44 | 42 | 45 |
| Prior qtr. | 41 | 39 | 42 | 41 | 39 | |
| % All credit needs not satisfied | 11/2005 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 6 |
| Prior qtr. | 5 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 | |
| % No credit needs | 11/2005 | 46 | 54 | 45 | 44 | 46 |
| Prior qtr. | 48 | 51 | 47 | 47 | 49 | |
| Fla. | North | Central | Gold Coast |
Tampa/ W. Coast | ||
| Prices | ||||||
| Purchasing prices (last three months) | ||||||
| Net % increased | 11/2005 | 59 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 66 |
| Prior qtr. | 55 | 57 | 53 | 57 | 54 | |
| Selling prices (last three months) | ||||||
| Net % increased | 11/2005 | 23 | 26 | 20 | 21 | 24 |
| Prior qtr. | 20 | 20 | 18 | 19 | 23 | |
| Miscellaneous | ||||||
| Involvement in start of another business | ||||||
| % "Yes" | 11/2005 | 14 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 13 |
| Prior qtr. | 13 | 12 | 10 | 17 | 9 | |
| Single most important business problem | ||||||
| % Weak sales | 11/2005 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 11 |
| Prior qtr. | 7 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 7 | |
| % Taxes | 11/2005 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| Prior qtr. | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 7 | |
| % Employee quality/costs | 11/2005 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 9 | 13 |
| Prior qtr. | 12 | 15 | 13 | 11 | 10 | |
| % Insurance | 11/2005 | 15 | 18 | 13 | 15 | 16 |
| Prior qtr. | 16 | 15 | 15 | 17 | 17 | |
| % Big-business competition | 11/2005 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 13 |
| Prior qtr. | 14 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 16 | |
| % Inflation/Rising prices | 11/2005 | 15 | 17 | 16 | 15 | 15 |
| Prior qtr. | 14 | 11 | 13 | 16 | 14 | |
| % Credit availability/Interest rates | 11/2005 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Prior qtr. | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 | |
| % Regulations/Red tape | 11/2005 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 8 | 8 |
| Prior qtr. | 8 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 9 | |
| Florida Quarterly Spotlight | |||||
| Fla. | North | Central | Gold Coast |
Tampa/ W. Coast | |
| How important is immigrant labor to businesses in your area? Is it very important, somewhat important, not too important or not at all important? | |||||
| Very important | 20% | 13% | 17% | 24% | 23% |
| Somewhat important | 26% | 22% | 22% | 29% | 27% |
| Not too important | 16% | 22% | 17% | 15% | 13% |
| Not at all important | 28% | 32% | 32% | 25% | 28% |
| Don't know/Refused | 9% | 12% | 13% | 7% | 9% |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Which best describes the role immigrant labor plays in your area? | |||||
| Provides skills not otherwise available | 10% | 5% | 9% | 13% | 10% |
| Fills jobs that otherwise wouldn't be filled | 33% | 33% | 27% | 36% | 34% |
| Crowds out American workers | 9% | 8% | 10% | 8% | 9% |
| No appreciable role | 26% | 28% | 32% | 23% | 27% |
| Don't know/Refused | 22% | 26% | 23% | 21% | 20% |
| Total | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
The Poll
NFIB’s Florida Small-Business ConditionsSM is a telephone survey of a random sample of Florida’s small employers regarding business condition within the state. “Small employer” is defined here as someone employing between one and 250 people (not including the owner(s)) in a for-profit business. Four separate regional surveys are conducted, each with a minimum of 350 respondents. The North Florida survey samples small employers in ZIP codes 32000-32099 and 32200-32699. Pensacola, Tallahassee, Jacksonville and Gainesville are included. The Central Florida survey samples small employers in ZIP codes 32100-32199, 32700-32999, 34400-34499 and 34700-34799. Daytona Beach, Ocala, Orlando and Vero Beach are included. The Gold Coast survey samples small employers in ZIP codes 33000-33499 and 34900-34999. Fort Pierce, West Palm Beach, Miami and the Keys are included. Finally, the Tampa Bay-South survey samples small employers in ZIP codes 33500-34299 and 34600-34699. Spring Hill, Lakeland, Sebring and Naples are included. The sampling error of each survey is ± 5 percentage points. States totals result by population weighting regional totals. Data are collected quarterly in the months of February, May, August and November, beginning in February 2005. The MRCGroup of Las Vegas conducts the survey for the NFIB Research Foundation.
The Sponsor
The NFIB Research Foundation is a 501 (c)(3) organization that provides policy-makers, media, educators, small-business owners and other interested parties empirically based information on small business and small-business owners. The Foundation is affiliated with the National Federation of Independent Business, the nation’s largest small- and independent-business advocacy organization, and is located in Washington, D.C.


