Issues in the News

 Print  |  E-mail  | -- Font | ++ Font | rss.gif
Let's Protect Both Workers and Democracy by Defeating Dangerous Card-Check Bill
04/10/2007

CONTACT: John Hodges, (304) 345-4535 or Jim Brown, (615) 874-5288

CHARLESTON, W.V. -- The following statement from John Hodges, state director of the National Federation of Independent Business/West Virginia, may be used in whole or part as an op-ed in your media outlet, or as part of any story you prepare on card-check legislation currently being considered by Congress. To obtain Hodges' headshot, please e-mail jim.brown@nfib.org. Thank you.

Successful entrepreneurs know that a key factor in running a thriving business is a good relationship between owners and their employees. In the current economy, with nearly full employment and intense competition for good workers, it's clearly in their interests to foster that relationship.

However, there's a movement in Congress that not only would undermine those efforts, but also would attack a sacred institution of American democracy -- the right to a secret ballot. A bill with the misleading name of the "Employee Free Choice Act" has been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and will be considered in the Senate. The bill would force employers to recognize a labor union without its employees first holding a secret-ballot election.

The bill would force the use of so-called "card-check agreements." Under a card-check system, a union gathers "authorization cards" signed by workers to supposedly express their desire to unionize. Once labor organizers collect cards from more than 50 percent of a business' workers, that business is unionized.

Once you take away an employee's right to make a free, unencumbered choice by a secret ballot, you subject them to an environment of potential harassment where it's difficult for them not to support forming a union. In addition, the business owner may well be surprised to find their employees unionized without ever having a chance to engage employees and explain the potential effects of a union on the business, which is permitted under current law.

Further, once a union presents its contract offer, the owner has four months to accept it. If he or she does not, the matter is turned over to the federal government for binding arbitration. That means that a bureaucrat with no familiarity with the business, or the industry that it's in, will singularly and solely, without appeal, decide the wages and benefits that business will provide.

This isn't to say that management is always perfect, or to excuse management teams that take huge compensation for poor performance, at the expense of employees. There are always exceptions of owners and managers who don't treat employees fairly, and that's wrong. But it simply isn't good public policy to make legislation on the basis of a few bad apples.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that union membership continues to decline nationwide. In the private sector, 7.4 percent of workers belonged to a union in 2006, continuing a decades-long decline from the approximately 35 percent of all workers who belonged to a union in the 1950s. However, while America has become less and less unionized, the economy has become stronger. Real wages are up, productivity is up and interest rates are low, as are unemployment rates. Why would we, as a country, want to go backwards economically?

The current system of secret-ballot elections is a legitimate process that's based on a fundamental part of American democracy. Let's not throw it out the window just for the sake of increasing union membership. For more information, go to www.myprivateballot.com.

John Hodges is state director of the National Federation of Independent Business, West Virginia's and the nation's leading small-business advocacy group.

 Print  |  E-mail  | -- Font | ++ Font | rss.gif