Vermont Legislative Report - January 16, 2014

Date: January 14, 2014

Related Content: NFIB in My State State Vermont

The single most important issue facing lawmakers during the upcoming
session is how to handle the State budget. 
It is projected that the budget faces a $70 million shortfall.  Although the $70 million figure does not
represent a significant increase compared to gaps that have been faced during
recent legislative sessions, this year there are no federal or alternate state
funds that can be used to help cover the shortfall.  Governor Shumlin is scheduled to present his
ideas for dealing with the budget to the Legislature on January 15, when he
delivers his annual Budget Address.

It is widely assumed that the $70 million shortfall will at
the very least have to lead to more efficient budgeting or even budget
cuts.  Legislators are expected to be
forced to take a hard look at many government programs to determine which ones are
working well, or to figure out which programs may be providing duplicate or
similar services.  Several key figures,
including Governor Shumlin, have maintained that the budget gap should be
addressed through tighter budgeting and not by increasing taxes.  Senate president pro tem John Campbell
stated:  “The priority, of course, is the
budget. And what the key is, for me, is to try to balance the budget without
raising any revenue. And people say, ‘Well how do you do that?’ …So, again, you
always go back to see how programs are working, whether there are certain costs
that are being incurred by certain departments or agencies that may be
superfluous or they’re not getting the result we had intended when we first
started the program.”

NFIB/VT will certainly be listening to Governor Shumlin’s
Budget Address on January 15, and paying close attention to the details and
priorities he puts forward in regards to the budget.  We encourage our members to tune in to the Address
which can be heard on many media outlets.

Health care reform is another ongoing issue that received
immediate attention at the start of the legislative session.  Governor Shumlin took the unusual step of
meeting with the House and Senate Health Committees on the first day of the
session to update legislators on where things stand with Vermont’s effort to
reform its health care system.  Shumlin
accepted responsibility for the very bumpy rollout of Vermont Health Connect,
the state’s new, highly criticized online health exchange.  “No one is more disappointed than I am that we
fell short of our rollout in the exchange, and I take responsibility for those
failures,” Shumlin said. “I know that we have work to do to restore Vermonters
confidence in our ability to get health care right.”

In fact, the House Health Care Committee has already
scheduled a week of oversight of Vermont Health Connect and lingering questions
about its effectiveness will likely be a topic of discussion during the first
part of the session.  For his part,
Governor Shumlin also announced that he would be temporarily reassigning
Secretary of Commerce Lawrence Miller to the Department of Vermont Health
Access, where he’ll use his “practical business management” experience to
identify and remedy problems.  Shumlin
said he’ll also commission an independent review of the exchange rollout, to
find out what went wrong, and how to make sure it doesn’t happen with the
state’s next big information technology venture.

That ‘next big information technology venture’ is likely
going to be Vermont’s effort to establish a single-payer health system.  The push toward a single-payer system will be
quietly overshadowing lawmakers’ healthcare discussions during the session.  Governor Shumlin voiced his continued unequivocal
support for moving toward such a system. 
He told lawmakers: “Let me be very clear: I have never been more
convinced of the need to keep moving forward. I have never been more certain
that we’re on the right path. And I’ve never been more committed to ushering in
America’s first universal affordable publicly financed health care system right
here in Vermont.” He also stated that he planned to outline the menu of taxes
that could be used to fund a single-payer system at some point during the
legislative session. Vermont’s potential single-payer system is expected to
cost $2 billion, and the governor wants to put it in place by 2017.  It is widely believed that some kind of a
payroll tax will be proposed as a funding mechanism for the single-payer system.

One of the most contentious topics of the Legislative
session will likely be the debate over whether to require employers to provide
paid sick leave to their employees.  A loud
coalition of 15 groups has been organizing to persuade the Legislature to pass
H.208, a bill that would require employees to accrue paid leave of 1 hour for
every 30 hours worked, up to a maximum of 56 hours in a 12 month period.  An employee’s accrued leave could be rolled
over each year, but employees could not ‘bank’ more than 56 hours. Employees
would be able to use their paid time to care for themselves or their family,
and also to remedy sexual and domestic violence problems.

NFIB/VT is staunchly opposed to mandating paid leave
requirements on Vermont’s small businesses. The mandated paid leave approach
called for by H.208 forces a “one-size-fits-all” requirement upon employers
which is neither necessary nor appropriate. 
Employers should be allowed to determine what leave policies are
appropriate based on the needs of their individual businesses. 75% of Vermont
businesses already provide some form of paid leave to their employees; most of
those that don’t simply can’t afford to, or would have great difficulty running
their businesses with such a mandate in place.  Indeed, surveys from other states where paid
sick leave laws have been put in place show that the laws tend to curtail
hiring, limit work hours offered to employees by employers, and scale back
other employee benefits.

The fact that H.208 does not exempt small businesses with
fewer than 25 employees from its requirements, as is the case with existing
maternity leave and family leave statutes in Vermont, is especially troubling
to NFIB/VT.   Thus, the monetary and administrative costs of
maintaining paid leave policies would be too great a burden on small Vermont

We will closely follow the debate over H.208 when it is
taken up by the legislature.  Governor
Shumlin has no yet said whether he would support a paid leave mandate, while House
Speaker Shap Smith has stated he supports the bill and that he will not stand
in the way of an up-or-down vote in the House. 
We encourage our members to immediately begin to reach out to your local
legislators to voice your concerns and share your thoughts on this proposed

Related Content: NFIB in My State | State | Vermont

Subscribe For Free News And Tips

Enter your email to get FREE small business insights. Learn more

Get to know NFIB

NFIB is America's leading small business association, promoting and protecting the right of our members to own, operate, and grow their business

Find out more about
NFIB Membership

Or call us today



State Issues

Choose Your State


YEF Foundation Research Center Legal Foundation

Member Benefits