Debate Over Single Payer Continues

Date: April 16, 2014

Related Content: News Healthcare Vermont

Last week, the House Committee on Health began discussion of S.252, a
Senate passed bill which aims to provide more clarity to what Vermont’s
proposed single payer healthcare system (Green Mountain Care) would look
like.  Act 48, the original statute that
set Vermont on a course toward a publicly financed, universal health care
system, required Governor Shumlin to provide a financing plan for Green
Mountain Care by January 1, 2013. After missing that deadline last year, the
Governor promised to provide a plan during the 2014 legislative session.  However, earlier this year he retracted that
promise and stated that no plan would be made public until January 2015.  Many legislators, from all political parties
are growing very frustrated by the lack of details surrounding Green Mountain
Care, especially since the proposed single payer system is estimated to cost
$2.2 billion and is due to begin on January 1, 2017. As recently as last week,
Senate President John Campbell (D-Windsor County) publically expressed concerns
and doubts about the direction of Vermont’s health care reform efforts.  Senator Campbell even suggested that a ‘Plan
B’ should be explored in case single payer reform does not work out.

To begin to get answers, Senate Finance Committee Chair Tim Ashe, D/P Burlington,
recently proposed S.252, requiring the Shumlin Administration to address some
of the important details of single payer reform by certain dates.  It would generally place firmer timeline and
reporting requirements on the Administration and ideally, move things along so
that Vermonters could determine whether a single payer plan would even be
workable.  Key provisions of the bill
call for providing greater clarity to what the benefits package would look like
under Green Mountain Care and what entity should administer the system.  Perhaps most importantly, Senator Ashe’s bill
calls for the Agency of Human Services to enter into a contract with an
“independent, nonpartisan project management entity” to provide
oversight of the implementation of Green Mountain Care.  NFIB/VT believes this makes the most sense.
At an annual cost of upwards of $2.2 billion, this huge endeavor is far too
important to be left to partisan politics.

The House, however, is prepared to strip out many of S.252’s
safeguards, including the independent oversight of Green Mountain Care. The
full text of Senator Ashe’s bill can be found here: S.252

Contact your legislator(s) as soon as possible, if you support gaining greater
clarity and providing better safeguards, including independent oversight, of
Green Mountain Care.

Related Content: News | Healthcare | Vermont

Subscribe For Free News And Tips

Enter your email to get FREE small business insights. Learn more

Get to know NFIB

NFIB is America's leading small business association, promoting and protecting the right of our members to own, operate, and grow their business

Find out more about
NFIB Membership

Or call us today



State Issues

Choose Your State


YEF Foundation Research Center Legal Foundation

Member Benefits