U.S. Supreme Court
This case involves a question of standing. The plaintiff alleged that the Encina Lodge violated the ADA’s public accommodation provisions. When D'Lil filed a motion for attorneys' fees, the district court, sua sponte, raised the question whether D'Lil – a serial ADA plaintiff - had standing to sue in the first place. The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court finding that D’Lil did not have standing.
Status: DECIDED. Amicus brief filed on March 6, 2009 in support of Best Western’s request that the Supreme Court review the Ninth Circuit’s decision. Court denied review on June 22, 2009.